<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First Roll of Film</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ryandubois.net/2005/10/first-roll-of-film/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ryandubois.net/2005/10/first-roll-of-film/</link>
	<description>your daily dose of dubulosity</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 09:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Xenith</title>
		<link>http://blog.ryandubois.net/2005/10/first-roll-of-film/#comment-375</link>
		<dc:creator>Xenith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 03:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ryandubois.net/archives/2005/10/26/first-roll-of-film/#comment-375</guid>
		<description>For B&#38;W matte is so much better.

Ditto for colour nature shots. For colour portrait (wel, any type of people shots) glossy tends t be better.

Also, if you are willing to go with slide film, I suggest Fujifilm Velvia 100 for nature/landscape/anything greeny. Fujifilm Provia 100 is good for most other things (people, architecture, etc), and it comes in a 400 version for lower-light situations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For B&amp;W matte is so much better.</p>
<p>Ditto for colour nature shots. For colour portrait (wel, any type of people shots) glossy tends t be better.</p>
<p>Also, if you are willing to go with slide film, I suggest Fujifilm Velvia 100 for nature/landscape/anything greeny. Fujifilm Provia 100 is good for most other things (people, architecture, etc), and it comes in a 400 version for lower-light situations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
